webinar.net Reviews & Product Details

Webinar.net has proven to be a valuable partner. I enjoy working with their system, which is easy to use. Their customer support has been excellent.

Nothing to not like. They've been good about pushing the boundaries, adding functions, showing us how to customize.

Client webinars on demand. We've seen a significant increase with the pandemic in the need for client webinars. Webinar.net has made the scalability of webinars easy. Lots of custom functions available.

The ability to customize the platform, and move around different features.

The program seemed like it requires a large bandwidth for users which was challenging for some international participants

Taking an in-person meeting virtual

I like the options on switching the functionality, and how there are so many different options for presentations!

If you're wanting to have your presentation focus on a panels video webcams, that can be a little tricky. Although the majority of the platform is very customizable, you are unable to enlarge the webcams.

My company primarily used webinar.net for webinars and client presentations. The reporting and on-demand recording functions are great in comparison to other platforms.

I thought it was pretty straight forward, also the on demand, and the value offered on the mainpage

I had problems with volunteers that didn't have band width , buffering :(

Solving the no in person issue, I like the on demand , and the do-over ability, easy to edit

The platform integrates the use of phone and webcam seamlessly. Very easy to connect using multiple options for easy delivery.

The back-end of the platform does not allow you to see playback of content.

Allows you to connect and engage with a diverse audience and easy for attendees to navigate.

It works. Our attendees liked it. They have enough aspects/features to their platform to make visitors feel like they are at a summit vs. just a bunch of webinars. The support received was also quite strong.

It could have been the "template" we picked given very short notice in light of the developing pandemic, but the interactivity between attendees wasn't fostered as much was viewed as a weakness.

We got an amazing number of registrants and net-new prospects to the platform. Not sure if that was due per se to Webinar.net, but employing a virtual platform really did wonders for us.

That it was compatible with Swoogo, our delegate management system

That you cannot use iPad or mobile phones to watch streams properly and cannot use Safari and only google chrome or Firefox. Also the ability to manipulate video boxes should be easier, there should be an option to make moderator video bigger and the panellist smaller. Also hate the video arrow bottom right of the video screen to enlarge it, so many speakers would not drag this! Lastly, Firewalls of companies had a hard time connecting as it is always mostly blocked from their firewall.

Seeing if we still want to use you this May and if it will work, we had lots of problems of being kicked out last time mid-conference, suddenly it kept unmuting the AV production team.

The only thing we liked was how the Audience view looked during live taping of the webinar. The audience was able to view presenters while accessing other webinar feaures.

Price per event is very expensive. Nickle and dime you for every feature, including obtaining recording. Lack of technical support pre and post webinar is an issue. Editing content in the back end is very challenging. You need a seperate webinar platform (Zoom) to host breakout rooms. It takes a long time to get techincal support response.

A platform where our audience can view presenters while having branding visible and the audience can get event materials.

I didn't like the platform, period. Appreciate the attempt made but lack of attendees is proof the technology wasn't well received.

It wasn't easily accessible for volunteers and constituents to access. Why didn't we use other platforms that everyone is more familiar? For example, Facebook live or zoom? Technology capabilities are not easily accessible to many. Too tech savvy oriented and not easy for our audience to use or access.

The ease of accessibility by our constituents is vital to our mission.